Historically any burn to a writeable CD/DVD was an uninteruptable process.
QuoteThen they are not fit for purpose, which is a completely different ball-game Then they are not fit for purpose, which is a completely different ball-game QuoteModern optical drives and software are *supposed* to be able to pick up a burn from where it left off (when there's a dropout of the transfer). Having installed Ubuntu, I have noticed quite an improvement in speed, considering XP Pro was NOT a 64bit OS and now I am using a 64bit OS, it can use the CPU to it's potential. If and when I do any burning, I would not be doing anything else to occupy the CPU/RAM like editing a video at the same time as I know about pushing the CPU when I used Window$, I quite often used to push the system to 100% and it slowed to a snails pace and I could'nt do anything else until it caught up. you're more likely to end up with a bunch of coasters. which will pretty much offset any time benefit from not just copying it to the HDD first. QuoteDisk to disk copying (optical drivers), particularly if the PC is doing any other I/O or anything CPU/RAM intensive, is not a good idea, to be sure that there is no dropout of data transfer (larger than the cache size) during the burn, you usually have to drop the "Write" speed in the software. with 4 HDD's and an optical drive already attached, unless you upgraded your power supply you may already be stretching it. Quote from: Mark Greaves (PCNetSpec) on July 31, 2012, 04:01:00 PM
0 kommentar(er)
